Originals: What I Took and How It Changed My Choices

My take on Originals - five ideas I used to test bolder options, manage risk, and change how I choose projects.

Loading image...
Click to view full size
Share this article

Originals: What I Took and How It Changed My Choices

I read Originals by Adam Grant because I wanted permission to try unusual ideas without waiting for permission. The book gives tools to test novelty, manage risk, and build allies. I walked away with five practical ideas I still use. This isn’t a full review. It’s what I adopted and how it changed my behavior.

The Book in One Line

Originals argues that creativity and non-conformity are systems you can practice: test small, manage risk, and recruit allies to scale what works.

5 Key Ideas That Matter

1. Test Before You Commit - Explanation: Try low-cost experiments to prove an idea before full launch. - Quote: "Originals test their ideas to reduce the chance of failure and the cost of trying." (paraphrase) - Why it matters: It made me run cheap pilots rather than wait for big approvals. - Takeaway: Small tests give courage and data.

2. Manage the Risk Portfolio - Explanation: Balance bold bets with a stable base-keep a day job or a side revenue stream while you test. - Quote: "Originals don't quit everything at once; they create a portfolio approach to risk." (paraphrase) - Why it matters: I kept steady income while exploring new products, which reduced fear. - Takeaway: You can be daring without being reckless.

3. Use Timing and Timing Signals - Explanation: Choose moments when people are more open to change. - Quote: "The right timing makes novelty feel less threatening." (paraphrase) - Why it matters: I scheduled sensitive asks after wins or calm moments. - Takeaway: Timing reduces resistance.

4. Recruit Allies Through Small Wins - Explanation: Show a tiny success to convert skeptics. - Quote: "People are persuaded by evidence they can see." (paraphrase) - Why it matters: I used micro-results to bring stakeholders on board. - Takeaway: Evidence beats rhetoric.

5. Fight the Status Quo With Empathy - Explanation: Frame change in others’ terms, not yours. - Quote: "Originals sell by making change feel like a gain, not a loss." (paraphrase) - Why it matters: I learned to present experiments as low-risk improvements, not threats. - Takeaway: Empathy opens doors to novelty.

Real-World Application

Here’s how I used the book. I wanted to test a new coaching product. I ran a five-person pilot with a discounted price and tight outcomes. I kept my main clients so cashflow stayed stable. After a positive micro-result, I used the data to recruit two paying pilot partners. The pilot gave timing signals (quarterly planning season) that helped acceptance. That micro-win created credibility. The approach saved me from overcommitting and taught me to lean on evidence rather than hope.

What the Book Gets Wrong (or Misses)

Grant gives many tactics, but some readers might under-estimate structural barriers like resource inequality or gatekeeping in certain industries. The advice is strongest when you can run experiments; it’s harder in tightly regulated contexts. Also, the human cost of repeated small failures isn’t discussed in depth. You still need emotional resilience to carry on when pilots don’t go well.

Final Takeaway

Originals taught me to treat bold ideas like experiments. Test small, protect your base, and bring others along with proof. It sharpened my willingness to try and lowered the price of failure. If you want to apply these ideas to your patterns of risk and creativity, try QUEST - it helps you see which experiments match your personality and where to start.

book summary

Discussion

Join the conversation

0 comments

Loading comments...

Stay Inspired

Join our community to receive curated mental models and insights directly to your inbox.